Psychoengineering: Difference between revisions
Octopirate (talk | contribs) (→Notes) |
Octopirate (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
</ref> and are thus connected to different parts of the brain. The neural circuitry of intuition (the amygdala, basal ganglia and lateral temporal cortex)<ref name="Lieberman, 2003">Lieberman, M. D. (2003). Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. ''Social Judgments: Implicit and Explicit Processes''.</ref> is linked to circuitry related to working memory, motor control, attention, perception, and empathy.<ref name="Ramezanpour & Fallah, 2022">Ramezanpour, H., & Fallah, M. (2022). The role of temporal cortex in the control of attention. ''Current Research in Neurobiology, 3'', 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100038</ref><ref name="Roozendaal et al., 2009">Roozendaal, B., McEwen, B. S., & Chattarji, S. (2009). Stress, memory and the amygdala. ''Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10''(6), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2651</ref><ref name="Schacter et al., 2020">Schacter, D. L., Daniel Todd Gilbert, Nock, M., & Wegner, D. M. (2020). ''Psychology'' (5th ed.). Worth Publishers, Macmillan Learning.</ref> Meanwhile, the neural circuitry of reason (anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, and the medial temporal lobe including the hippocampus)<ref name="Lieberman, 2003" /> is linked to circuitry related to long-term memory recall, executive function, and complex decision-making.<ref name="Aharoni et al., 2013">Aharoni, E., Vincent, G. M., Harenski, C. L., Calhoun, V. D., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Gazzaniga, M. S., & Kiehl, K. A. (2013). Neuroprediction of future rearrest. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110''(15), 6223–6228. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219302110</ref><ref name="Friedman & Robbins, 2021">Friedman, N. P., & Robbins, T. W. (2021). The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function. ''Neuropsychopharmacology, 47''(47), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01132-0</ref> |
</ref> and are thus connected to different parts of the brain. The neural circuitry of intuition (the amygdala, basal ganglia and lateral temporal cortex)<ref name="Lieberman, 2003">Lieberman, M. D. (2003). Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. ''Social Judgments: Implicit and Explicit Processes''.</ref> is linked to circuitry related to working memory, motor control, attention, perception, and empathy.<ref name="Ramezanpour & Fallah, 2022">Ramezanpour, H., & Fallah, M. (2022). The role of temporal cortex in the control of attention. ''Current Research in Neurobiology, 3'', 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100038</ref><ref name="Roozendaal et al., 2009">Roozendaal, B., McEwen, B. S., & Chattarji, S. (2009). Stress, memory and the amygdala. ''Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10''(6), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2651</ref><ref name="Schacter et al., 2020">Schacter, D. L., Daniel Todd Gilbert, Nock, M., & Wegner, D. M. (2020). ''Psychology'' (5th ed.). Worth Publishers, Macmillan Learning.</ref> Meanwhile, the neural circuitry of reason (anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, and the medial temporal lobe including the hippocampus)<ref name="Lieberman, 2003" /> is linked to circuitry related to long-term memory recall, executive function, and complex decision-making.<ref name="Aharoni et al., 2013">Aharoni, E., Vincent, G. M., Harenski, C. L., Calhoun, V. D., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Gazzaniga, M. S., & Kiehl, K. A. (2013). Neuroprediction of future rearrest. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110''(15), 6223–6228. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219302110</ref><ref name="Friedman & Robbins, 2021">Friedman, N. P., & Robbins, T. W. (2021). The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function. ''Neuropsychopharmacology, 47''(47), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01132-0</ref> |
||
These systems are implicated in different behaviors, but like everything in the brain they are deeply connected and regularly interface with each other. For example, one could notice a dessert table and be drawn to it by their intuitive, perceptual mind - but ultimately be drawn away from it by their logical mind.<ref name="Darlow & Sloman, 2010" /> |
These systems are implicated in different behaviors, but like everything in the brain they are deeply connected and regularly interface with each other. For example, one could notice a dessert table and be drawn to it by their intuitive, perceptual mind - but ultimately be drawn away from it by their logical mind.<ref name="Darlow & Sloman, 2010" /><ref group="note" name="note A">Psychoengineering uses "empathetic/logical mind" for these systems, but they have many different names in contemporary psychology. Stanovich uses "systems 1/2", so as to not give a preference to either system. Evans has used "old/new mind", in reference to the evolutionary age of each system.<ref name="Evans & Stanovich, 2013">Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition. ''Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8''(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685</ref> Darlow and Sloman use "intuitive/deliberate system" to emphasize the level of conscious control present in each.<ref name="Darlow & Sloman, 2010" /></ref> |
||
{| class="wikitable" style="margin: auto; empty-cells: hide;" |
{| class="wikitable" style="margin: auto; empty-cells: hide;" |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
== Notes == |
== Notes == |
||
<references group="note" /> |
|||
:note A.{{note|noteA}}Psychoengineering uses "empathetic/logical mind" for these systems, but they have many different names in contemporary psychology. Stanovich uses "systems 1/2", so as to not give a preference to either system. Evans has used "old/new mind", in reference to the evolutionary age of each system.<ref name="Evans & Stanovich, 2013">Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition. ''Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8''(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685</ref> Darlow and Sloman use "intuitive/deliberate system" to emphasize the level of conscious control present in each.<ref name="Darlow & Sloman, 2010" /> |
|||
== References == |
== References == |
||
<references /> |
|||
{{reflist}} |
Revision as of 20:58, 9 March 2024
Psychoengineering is a research-based engineering practice designed to control and mitigate mental disorders such as depression and anxiety. This site serves as a guide to psychoengineering and how to perform it.
Humans have two primary systems of acquiring knowledge: intuition, a fast and unconscious reflex; and logic, a slow and deliberate process.[1] Each of these dual cognitive methods is designed to interface with a specific type of information,[2] and are thus connected to different parts of the brain. The neural circuitry of intuition (the amygdala, basal ganglia and lateral temporal cortex)[3] is linked to circuitry related to working memory, motor control, attention, perception, and empathy.[4][5][6] Meanwhile, the neural circuitry of reason (anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, and the medial temporal lobe including the hippocampus)[3] is linked to circuitry related to long-term memory recall, executive function, and complex decision-making.[7][8]
These systems are implicated in different behaviors, but like everything in the brain they are deeply connected and regularly interface with each other. For example, one could notice a dessert table and be drawn to it by their intuitive, perceptual mind - but ultimately be drawn away from it by their logical mind.[2]Cite error: Closing </ref>
missing for <ref>
tag Darlow and Sloman use "intuitive/deliberate system" to emphasize the level of conscious control present in each.[2]</ref>
Empathetic mind | Logical mind |
---|---|
|
|
Notes
References
- ^ Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- ^ a b c Darlow, A. L., & Sloman, S. A. (2010). Two systems of reasoning: architecture and relation to emotion. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(3), 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.34
- ^ a b Lieberman, M. D. (2003). Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Social Judgments: Implicit and Explicit Processes.
- ^ Ramezanpour, H., & Fallah, M. (2022). The role of temporal cortex in the control of attention. Current Research in Neurobiology, 3, 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100038
- ^ Roozendaal, B., McEwen, B. S., & Chattarji, S. (2009). Stress, memory and the amygdala. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2651
- ^ Schacter, D. L., Daniel Todd Gilbert, Nock, M., & Wegner, D. M. (2020). Psychology (5th ed.). Worth Publishers, Macmillan Learning.
- ^ Aharoni, E., Vincent, G. M., Harenski, C. L., Calhoun, V. D., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Gazzaniga, M. S., & Kiehl, K. A. (2013). Neuroprediction of future rearrest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15), 6223–6228. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219302110
- ^ Friedman, N. P., & Robbins, T. W. (2021). The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function. Neuropsychopharmacology, 47(47), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01132-0